Todd Widom vs Go Soeda, Brisbane Challenger 2007, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 1 Dec

Final

Todd Widom

LostRank #1502

Soeda won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 26–7²

Go Soeda

WinnerRank #683

Venue

Club Coops

Brisbane, AUS· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

26 m

Sea level

Head to head

1Widom

2Soeda

3 meetings

Brisbane ChallengerSemifinal · 1 Dec 2007HardThis match
Go Soeda
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Todd Widom
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6²
Seoul ChallengerRound of 32 · 27 Oct 2009Hard
Go Soeda
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Todd Widom
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
Granby ChallengerRound of 16 · 10 Jul 2008Hard
Todd Widom
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Go Soeda
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 3Set 3: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Todd Widom vs Go Soeda, Brisbane Challenger 2007, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research