Bart Beks vs Sebastian Esquetini, Quito Challenger 2007, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Sat 6 Oct

Final

Bart Beks

WinnerRank #1567

Beks won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–3

Sebastian Esquetini

LostUnranked

Venue

Club de Tenis Buena Vista

Quito, ECU· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

10 km/h

Light

Humidity

92%

Very humid

Temperature

16°C

Mild

Altitude

2836 m

Very high

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Beks

0Esquetini

1 meeting

Quito ChallengerQualifying R1 · 6 Oct 2007ClayThis match
Bart Beks
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sebastian Esquetini
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Form and path

Bart Beks

No recent matches recorded.

Sebastian Esquetini0–1

Quito CHClay

LQualifying R1
Andres Arango
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sebastian Esquetini
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Bart Beks vs Sebastian Esquetini, Quito Challenger 2007, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research