Marcus Sarstrand vs J.P. Ritchie, Tulsa Challenger 2007, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 22 Sept

Final

Marcus Sarstrand

WinnerRank #1377

Sarstrand won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–0

Set 26–1

J.P. Ritchie

LostUnranked

Venue

Philcrest Hills Tennis Club

Tulsa, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

63%

Moderate

Temperature

31°C

Warm

Altitude

188 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Sarstrand

0Ritchie

1 meeting

Tulsa ChallengerQualifying R1 · 22 Sept 2007HardThis match
Marcus Sarstrand
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
J.P. Ritchie
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 1

Form and path

Marcus Sarstrand

No recent matches recorded.

J.P. Ritchie0–1

Tulsa CHHard

LQualifying R1
Lesley Joseph
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
J.P. Ritchie
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Marcus Sarstrand vs J.P. Ritchie, Tulsa Challenger 2007, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research