Rajeev Ram vs Fritz Wolmarans, Lubbock Challenger 2007, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 21 Sept

Final

Rajeev Ram

LostRank #1076

Wolmarans won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 16–7⁶

Set 26–3

Set 35–7

Fritz Wolmarans

WinnerRank #1748

Venue

Don & Ethel McLeod Tennis Center

Lubbock, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

19 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

64%

Moderate

Temperature

29°C

Warm

Altitude

984 m

High

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Ram

1Wolmarans

2 meetings

Lubbock ChallengerQuarterfinal · 21 Sept 2007HardThis match
Fritz Wolmarans
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 3Set 3: 7
Rajeev Ram
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
Gimcheon ChallengerRound of 32 · 6 May 2014Hard
Rajeev Ram
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Fritz Wolmarans
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 3Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Rajeev Ram vs Fritz Wolmarans, Lubbock Challenger 2007, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research