Daniel Koellerer vs Mathieu Montcourt, Como Challenger 2007, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Clay · Fri 31 Aug

Final

Daniel Koellerer

WinnerRank #385

Koellerer won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–4

Set 26–7³

Set 36–3

Mathieu Montcourt

LostRank #119

Venue

Tennis Como

Como, ITA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

70%

Humid

Temperature

23°C

Warm

Altitude

206 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

2Koellerer

0Montcourt

2 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 1–0

Como ChallengerQuarterfinal · 31 Aug 2007ClayThis match
Daniel Koellerer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6³Set 3: 6
Mathieu Montcourt
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 3
Andrezieux ChallengerRound of 32 · 31 Jan 2006Hard
Daniel Koellerer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Mathieu Montcourt
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Daniel Koellerer vs Mathieu Montcourt, Como Challenger 2007, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research