Catalin Ionut Gard vs Michael Ryderstedt, Timisoara Challenger 2007, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 1 Aug

Final

Catalin Ionut Gard

WinnerRank #1458

Gard won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–0

Michael Ryderstedt

LostRank #1768

Venue

Hotel 2000 — tennis courts

Timișoara, ROU· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

10 km/h

Light

Humidity

58%

Moderate

Temperature

26°C

Warm

Altitude

92 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Gard

1Ryderstedt

2 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 0–1

Timisoara ChallengerRound of 16 · 1 Aug 2007ClayThis match
Catalin Ionut Gard
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Michael Ryderstedt
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0
Little RockRound of 16 · 2010Hard
Michael Ryderstedt
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Catalin Ionut Gard
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Catalin Ionut Gard vs Michael Ryderstedt, Timisoara Challenger 2007, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research