Nathan Thompson vs Karan Rastogi, Washington 2007, Qualifying R1

Final

Nathan Thompson

WinnerATP: 1204

Thompson won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–1

Karan Rastogi

LostATP: 1606

William H.G. FitzGerald Tennis CenterWashington, USA

Outdoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

1.4106.2Fast

ConditionsHistorical daily weather

33°CHot

7km/hLight

67%Moderate

81mLow

Match stats

5Aces1

0Double faults5

32Service points won19

7Service games played8

7Service games won3

8Return games played7

1/1100%Break points saved17%1/6

5/683%Break points converted0%0/1

Head to head

1Thompson

1Rastogi

2 meetings

WashingtonQualifying R1 · 28 Jul 2007HardThis match
Nathan Thompson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Karan Rastogi
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1
ChandigarhQuarterfinal · 2010Hard
Karan Rastogi
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nathan Thompson
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nathan Thompson vs Karan Rastogi, Washington 2007, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research