Tom Rushby vs Patrick Eichenberger, Nottingham Challenger 2007, Qualifying R2

Challenger · Qualifying R2 · Grass · Sun 22 Jul

Final

Tom Rushby

LostRank #1738

Eichenberger won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 16–4

Set 25–7

Set 34–6

Patrick Eichenberger

WinnerRank #1772

Venue

Nottingham Tennis Centre

Nottingham, GBR· Grass

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

26 m

Sea level

Head to head

1Rushby

1Eichenberger

2 meetings

Nottingham ChallengerQualifying R2 · 22 Jul 2007GrassThis match
Patrick Eichenberger
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Tom Rushby
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 4
FelixstoweRound of 32 · 2006Grass
Tom Rushby
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Patrick Eichenberger
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 3Set 3: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tom Rushby vs Patrick Eichenberger, Nottingham Challenger 2007, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research