Fred Hemmes vs Ruben Bemelmans, Espelkamp 2007, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Clay

Final

Fred Hemmes

LostRank #1635

Bemelmans won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 24–6

Ruben Bemelmans

WinnerRank #1092

Venue

Venue not available

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Head to head

0Hemmes

1Bemelmans

1 meeting

EspelkampSemifinal · 2007ClayThis match
Ruben Bemelmans
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Fred Hemmes
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Form and path

Fred Hemmes2–4

AntalyaClay

LRound of 32
Charles Roche
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Fred Hemmes
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 0

AntalyaClay

LRound of 16
Andrei Gorban
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Fred Hemmes
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 5Set 3: 4
WRound of 32
Fred Hemmes
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5
Goran Tosic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1
Goran Tosic · Retired

AntalyaClay

LRound of 32
Alejandro Kon
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 7
Fred Hemmes
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 5

JerseyHard

LRound of 16
Martin Pedersen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Fred Hemmes
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5
WRound of 32
Fred Hemmes
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Daniel Evans
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

Ruben Bemelmans0–6

AntwerpHard

LQualifying R1
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Ruben Bemelmans
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 3

Ilkley CHGrass

LQualifying R1
Zizou Bergs
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Ruben Bemelmans
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 4

Tunis CHClay

LRound of 32
Zhizhen Zhang
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ruben Bemelmans
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

Heilbronn CHClay

LQualifying R1
Rudolf Molleker
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7⁷
Ruben Bemelmans
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁴

NottinghamHard

LRound of 32
Henry Patten
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Ruben Bemelmans
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 2

NottinghamHard

LSemifinal
Antoine Escoffier
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Ruben Bemelmans
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Fred Hemmes vs Ruben Bemelmans, Espelkamp 2007, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research