Paul Capdeville vs Pablo Cuevas, Tunica Resorts Challenger 2007, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 9 May

Final

Paul Capdeville

LostRank #1186

Cuevas won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 11–6

Set 27–6³

Set 30–6

Pablo Cuevas

WinnerRank #841

Venue

Tunica National Golf & Tennis

Tunica Resorts, USA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

17 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

70%

Humid

Temperature

31°C

Warm

Altitude

65 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Capdeville

2Cuevas

2 meetings

Tunica Resorts ChallengerRound of 16 · 9 May 2007ClayThis match
Pablo Cuevas
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6³Set 3: 6
Paul Capdeville
Sets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 0
Vina del MarQuarterfinal · 6 Feb 2009Clay
Pablo Cuevas
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7
Paul Capdeville
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Paul Capdeville vs Pablo Cuevas, Tunica Resorts Challenger 2007, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research