Marcio Torres vs Cary Rubin, Joplin Challenger 2007, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 10 Feb

Final

Marcio Torres

WinnerRank #1249

Torres won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–0

Set 26–2

Cary Rubin

LostUnranked

Venue

Millennium Tennis & Fitness Club

Joplin, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

308 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Moderate

Head to head

1Torres

0Rubin

1 meeting

Joplin ChallengerQualifying R1 · 10 Feb 2007HardThis match
Marcio Torres
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Cary Rubin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2

Form and path

Marcio Torres

No recent matches recorded.

Cary Rubin1–2

Lexington CHHard

LQualifying R1
Marcus Fluitt
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Cary Rubin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Lexington CHHard

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Marcio Torres vs Cary Rubin, Joplin Challenger 2007, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research