Rob Steckley vs Christopher Lam, Maui Challenger 2006, Qualifying R2

Challenger · Qualifying R2 · Hard · Sun 26 Nov

Final

Rob Steckley

LostRank #1215

Lam won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 24–6

Christopher Lam

WinnerRank #1538

Venue

Wailea Tennis Club

Maui, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

42 m

Sea level

Head to head

0Steckley

2Lam

2 meetings

Hard 0–1Clay 0–1

Maui ChallengerQualifying R2 · 26 Nov 2006HardThis match
Christopher Lam
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Rob Steckley
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
PittsburghRound of 16 · 2006Clay
Christopher Lam
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 7
Rob Steckley
Sets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Rob Steckley vs Christopher Lam, Maui Challenger 2006, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research