Lassi Ketola vs Jasper Smit, Helsinki Challenger 2006, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 11 Nov

Final

Lassi Ketola

LostRank #1571

Smit won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 10–6

Set 26–4

Set 36–7³

Jasper Smit

WinnerRank #706

Venue

Tali Tennis Center

Helsinki, FIN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

12 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Head to head

0Ketola

1Smit

1 meeting

Helsinki ChallengerQualifying R1 · 11 Nov 2006HardThis match
Jasper Smit
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 7⁷
Lassi Ketola
Sets won: 1Set 1: 0Set 2: 6Set 3: 6³

Form and path

Lassi Ketola3–3

Tampere CHClay

Helsinki CHHard

Aachen CHCarpet

LQualifying R1
Dennis Van Scheppingen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Lassi Ketola
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Jasper Smit

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Lassi Ketola vs Jasper Smit, Helsinki Challenger 2006, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research