Cecil Mamiit vs Zack Fleishman, Tulsa Challenger 2006, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 29 Sept

Final

Cecil Mamiit

WinnerRank #15731.6557%

Mamiit won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–2

Set 22–6

Set 36–4

Zack Fleishman

LostRank #14672.2043%

Venue

Philcrest Hills Tennis Club

Tulsa, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

22 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

44%

Comfortable

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

188 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Mamiit

1Fleishman

2 meetings

Tulsa ChallengerQuarterfinal · 29 Sept 2006HardThis match
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 6
Zack Fleishman
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 4
Sacramento ChallengerRound of 32 · 10 Oct 2006Hard
Zack Fleishman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Cecil Mamiit
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 1Set 3: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Cecil Mamiit vs Zack Fleishman, Tulsa Challenger 2006, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research