Matwe Middelkoop vs Igor Sijsling, Almere 2006, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay

Final

Matwe Middelkoop

LostRank #1172

Sijsling won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 25–7

Igor Sijsling

WinnerRank #854

Venue

Centre Point / Club Pellikaan Almere

Almere, NED· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

-3 m

Sea level

Head to head

0Middelkoop

2Sijsling

2 meetings

Clay 0–1Hard 0–1

AlmereQuarterfinal · 2006ClayThis match
Igor Sijsling
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Matwe Middelkoop
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 5
AucklandQualifying R3 · 7 Jan 2013Hard
Igor Sijsling
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Matwe Middelkoop
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 4

Form and path

Matwe Middelkoop3–3

s HertogenboschGrass

LQualifying R1
Vasek Pospisil
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁹Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Matwe Middelkoop
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7¹¹Set 2: 1Set 3: 3

Irving CHHard

Mons CHHard

LQualifying R2
Alexandre Sidorenko
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Matwe Middelkoop
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3

Igor Sijsling2–4

Mallorca CHHard

LQualifying R1
Kenny De Schepper
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Igor Sijsling
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6²Set 3: 1

Lisbon CHClay

LRound of 32
Andrea Pellegrino
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Igor Sijsling
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 4

Braga CHClay

LRound of 32
Michael Vrbensky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Igor Sijsling
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Prague 3 CHClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Matwe Middelkoop vs Igor Sijsling, Almere 2006, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research