Tomas Cakl vs Jan Mertl, Donetsk Challenger 2006, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 9 Sept

Final

Tomas Cakl

WinnerRank #10821.4564%

Cakl won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–4

Jan Mertl

LostRank #18442.6036%

Venue

Venue not available

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Head to head

1Cakl

1Mertl

2 meetings

Donetsk ChallengerSemifinal · 9 Sept 2006ClayThis match
Tomas Cakl
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jan Mertl
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
Freudenstadt ChallengerQuarterfinal · 1 Sept 2006Clay
Jan Mertl
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁶Set 3: 6
Tomas Cakl
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁸Set 3: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tomas Cakl vs Jan Mertl, Donetsk Challenger 2006, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research