Artemon Apostu Efremov vs Catalin Ionut Gard, Sofia 2006, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Clay

Final

Artemon Apostu Efremov

LostRank #1376

Gard won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 24–6

Catalin Ionut Gard

WinnerRank #1458

Venue

Venue not available

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Head to head

2Efremov

1Gard

3 meetings

SofiaQuarterfinal · 2006ClayThis match
Catalin Ionut Gard
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Artemon Apostu Efremov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
TimișoaraQuarterfinal · 2005Clay
Artemon Apostu Efremov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Catalin Ionut Gard
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
BucharestSemifinal · 2005Clay
Artemon Apostu Efremov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Catalin Ionut Gard
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 5Set 3: 3

Form and path

Artemon Apostu Efremov5–1

ChitilaClay

BucharestClay

WQualifying R3
Artemon Apostu Efremov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Bastian Parada
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0

Catalin Ionut Gard3–3

AtlantaHard

LQualifying R1
Stefan Kozlov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Catalin Ionut Gard
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

PaduaClay

LQualifying R3
Marcel Felder
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Catalin Ionut Gard
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2
WQualifying R2
Catalin Ionut Gard
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nicola Vidal
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

PlovdivClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Artemon Apostu Efremov vs Catalin Ionut Gard, Sofia 2006, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research