Jakub Hasek vs Jan Stancik, Unterföhring 2006, Quarterfinal

Final

Jakub Hasek

LostATP: 1204

Stancik won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 16–7⁶

Set 24–6

Jan Stancik

WinnerATP: 1860

SportScheck Allwetteranlage / Scheck ClubUnterföhring, GER

Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Data unavailable

ConditionsForecast not yet available

—

—

—

512mModerate

Head to head

0Hasek

1Stancik

1 meeting

UnterföhringQuarterfinal · 2006ClayThis match
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 4

Form and path

Jakub Hasek3–3

LeimenHard

LRound of 32
Patrick Schmolzer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

OpoleClay

LRound of 32
Marko Mokrzycki
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 0
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
Jakub Hasek · Retired

BratislavaClay

LSemifinal
Jan Kroslak
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 7
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6²Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁴
WQuarterfinal
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Igor Zelenay
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6²Set 2: 2
WRound of 16
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Eddy Chala
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 0
WRound of 32
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tomas Toman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Jan Stancik2–4

TrnavaClay

LRound of 32
Filip Brtnicky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4
Jan Stancik · Retired

MichalovceClay

LRound of 16
Jan Blecha
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 7
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 5
WRound of 32
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ljubomir Celebic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

Tatranská LomnicaClay

LRound of 16
Samuel Bensoussan
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
WRound of 32
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 7
Pirmin Haenle
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 1Set 3: 5

PorečClay

LQualifying R2
Tomislav Draganja
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Jan Stancik
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jakub Hasek vs Jan Stancik, Unterföhring 2006, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research