Jan Michael Gambill vs Nathan Healey, Binghamton Challenger 2006, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 9 Aug

Final · Retired

Jan Michael Gambill

LostRank #1352

Healey won · Retired

1–1

Set 17–6¹⁰

Set 23–6

Set 30–3

Nathan Healey

WinnerRank #1134

Venue

Recreation Park tennis courts, Binghamton

Binghamton, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

60%

Moderate

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

262 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Gambill

1Healey

1 meeting

Binghamton ChallengerRound of 16 · 9 Aug 2006HardThis match
Nathan Healey
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6¹⁰Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
Jan Michael Gambill
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7¹²Set 2: 3Set 3: 0
Jan Michael Gambill · Retired

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Michael Gambill vs Nathan Healey, Binghamton Challenger 2006, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research