Alberto Francis vs Robert Smeets, Binghamton Challenger 2006, Qualifying R3

Challenger · Qualifying R3 · Hard · Mon 7 Aug

Final

Alberto Francis

LostRank #1006

Smeets won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 21–6

Robert Smeets

WinnerRank #1177

Venue

Recreation Park tennis courts, Binghamton

Binghamton, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

17 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

65%

Moderate

Temperature

30°C

Warm

Altitude

262 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Francis

1Smeets

2 meetings

Binghamton ChallengerQualifying R3 · 7 Aug 2006HardThis match
Robert Smeets
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Alberto Francis
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1
IrvineQuarterfinal · 2006Hard
Alberto Francis
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6²Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Robert Smeets
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 5Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Alberto Francis vs Robert Smeets, Binghamton Challenger 2006, Qualifying R3

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research