Rafael Arevalo vs Michael Johnson, Tuxtla Gutiérrez 2006, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-2 6-0Venue and conditions
Venue not available
Outdoor hardCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditions
Forecast not yet available
Head to head
1Arevalo
0Johnson
1 meeting- Tuxtla GutiérrezRound of 16 · 2006HardThis matchRafael ArevaloSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michael JohnsonSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0
Form and path
Rafael Arevalo2–4
Santa TeclaClay
- LRound of 32Marcelo ArevaloSets won: 0Set 1: 67Set 2: 3Rafael ArevaloSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 3
Rafael Arevalo · Retired
Guatemala CityHard
- LQualifying R2Kevin Jack CarpenterSets won: 0Set 1: 5Rafael ArevaloSets won: 1Set 1: 7
Rafael Arevalo · Retired
- WQualifying R1Rafael ArevaloSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Oscar TorresSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
Santa TeclaClay
- LRound of 32Rodrigo SanchezSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Rafael ArevaloSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
Guatemala CityHard
- LQualifying R2Eduardo Yahir Orozco RangelSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Rafael ArevaloSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 65Set 3: 4
- WQualifying R1Rafael ArevaloSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Jorge Alberto EscutiaSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 61
Michael Johnson1–5
GuadalajaraClay
- LRound of 32Rolando VargasSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michael JohnsonSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Córdoba (Mexico)Hard
- LRound of 32Juan Manuel ElizondoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michael JohnsonSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
Tallahassee CHHard
GatineauHard
- LRound of 32Jason ZimmermannSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michael JohnsonSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.