Jean Christophe Faurel vs Brendan Evans, Lexington Challenger 2006, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 28 Jul

Final

Jean Christophe Faurel

LostRank #1478

Evans won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 24–6

Brendan Evans

WinnerRank #1239

Venue

Hilary J. Boone Tennis Center

Lexington, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

15 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

70%

Humid

Temperature

29°C

Warm

Altitude

308 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Faurel

2Evans

2 meetings

Lexington ChallengerQuarterfinal · 28 Jul 2006HardThis match
Brendan Evans
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jean Christophe Faurel
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
Noumea ChallengerQuarterfinal · 8 Jan 2009Hard
Brendan Evans
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Jean Christophe Faurel
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6³Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jean Christophe Faurel vs Brendan Evans, Lexington Challenger 2006, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research