Justin Gimelstob vs Andy Murray, Newport 2006, Semifinal

ATP Intl Series · Semifinal · Grass · Sat 15 Jul

Final

Justin Gimelstob

WinnerRank #8414.3723%Upset

Gimelstob won in 2 sets · 1h 30m

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 27–6⁴

Andy Murray

LostRank #1601.2777%

Venue

International Tennis Hall of Fame

Newport, USA· Grass

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

1.2vs last year

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

88%

Very humid

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

26 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 30m

6Aces2

2Double faults2

43Service points won40

9Service games played10

9Service games won7

10Return games played9

0/0Break points saved25%1/4

3/475%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Gimelstob

0Murray

1 meeting

NewportSemifinal · 15 Jul 2006GrassThis match
Justin Gimelstob
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Andy Murray
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Justin Gimelstob vs Andy Murray, Newport 2006, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research