Conor Niland vs Frederik Nielsen, Limerick 2006, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
7-5 6-4Venue and conditions
Limerick Lawn Tennis ClubLimerick, IRL
CarpetCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
2Niland
2Nielsen
4 meetingsCarpet 0–2Hard 2–0
- LimerickQuarterfinal · 2006CarpetThis matchFrederik NielsenSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Conor NilandSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4
- LoughboroughSemifinal · 13 Nov 2010CarpetFrederik NielsenSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Conor NilandSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
- Yuba CityRound of 32 · 2 Jun 2009HardConor NilandSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 0Set 3: 6Frederik NielsenSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
- IzmirQualifying R3 · 11 May 2009HardConor NilandSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Frederik NielsenSets won: 1Set 1: 0Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
Form and path
Conor Niland2–4
Kyoto CHCarpet
Singapore CHHard
MontpellierHard
Frederik Nielsen1–5
New YorkHard
Phoenix CHHard
Noumea CHHard
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.