Manuel Jorquera vs Petar Jelenic, Koper 2006, Semifinal
Final score
Final
3-6 6-3 6-2Venue and conditions
Venue not available
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditions
Forecast not yet available
Head to head
1Jorquera
0Jelenic
1 meeting- KoperSemifinal · 2006ClayThis matchManuel JorqueraSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Petar JelenicSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2
Form and path
Manuel Jorquera2–4
Guangzhou Nansha CHHard
EsteClay
- LRound of 32Oscar Rodriguez SanchezSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Manuel JorqueraSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
FesClay
- LRound of 16Mehdi ZiadiSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Manuel JorqueraSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 1
- WRound of 32Manuel JorqueraSets won: 2Set 1: 0Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Talal OuahabiSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 1
TangerClay
- LRound of 16Mehdi ZiadiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Manuel JorqueraSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 1
Petar Jelenic2–4
SarajevoCarpet
- LRound of 32Dennis BloemkeSets won: 0Set 1: 2Petar JelenicSets won: 0Set 1: 2
Petar Jelenic · Retired
ZagrebHard
Kuala LumpurHard
- LRound of 32Marin BradaricSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2Petar JelenicSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1
Petar Jelenic · Retired
Kuala LumpurHard
- LFinalKittipong WachiramanowongSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Petar JelenicSets won: 0Set 1: 66Set 2: 3
- WSemifinalPetar JelenicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Peerakiat SiriluethaiwattanaSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.