Nicolas Devilder vs Sasa Tuksar, Furth Challenger 2006, Round of 32

Challenger · Round of 32 · Clay · Tue 6 Jun

Final

Nicolas Devilder

LostRank #10712.2042%

Tuksar won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 16–7⁵

Set 23–6

Sasa Tuksar

WinnerRank #17681.6058%

Venue

TV 1860 Furth (Franken Challenge / Schickedanz Open)

Furth, GER· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Light

Humidity

73%

Humid

Temperature

15°C

Mild

Altitude

322 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Devilder

1Tuksar

2 meetings

Furth ChallengerRound of 32 · 6 Jun 2006ClayThis match
Sasa Tuksar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Nicolas Devilder
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 3
Ostrava ChallengerSemifinal · 7 May 2005Clay
Nicolas Devilder
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3
Sasa Tuksar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2
Sasa Tuksar · Retired

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nicolas Devilder vs Sasa Tuksar, Furth Challenger 2006, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research