Martin Vilarrubi vs Marcelo Demoliner, Chapecó 2006, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-3 6-0Venue and conditions
Venue not available
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditions
Forecast not yet available
Head to head
2Vilarrubi
0Demoliner
2 meetings- ChapecóRound of 16 · 2006ClayThis matchMartin VilarrubiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marcelo DemolinerSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0
- Novo HamburgoRound of 32 · 2006ClayMartin VilarrubiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marcelo DemolinerSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1
Form and path
Martin Vilarrubi2–4
Santiago CHClay
Lima CHClay
- LRound of 16Marcos DanielSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Martin VilarrubiSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 0Set 3: 2
- WRound of 32Martin VilarrubiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jeanpierre FortSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0
- WQualifying R2Martin VilarrubiSets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Gonzalo TurSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 2
TucumánClay
- LRound of 32Gustavo RamirezSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Martin VilarrubiSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
Buenos AiresClay
- LRound of 16Eduardo SchwankSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Martin VilarrubiSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
Marcelo Demoliner2–4
Oeiras 5 CHClay
AucklandHard
Tashkent CHHard
- LQualifying R3Alexander VasilenkoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marcelo DemolinerSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R2Marcelo DemolinerSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Temur IsmailovSets won: 0Set 1: 64Set 2: 65
- WQualifying R1Marcelo DemolinerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6Kristian LozanSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 1
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.