Viktor Troicki vs Kamil Capkovic, Dharwad Challenger 2006, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 28 Apr

Final

Viktor Troicki

WinnerRank #1433

Troicki won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–3

Kamil Capkovic

LostRank #1691

Venue

Dharwad District Lawn Tennis Association

Dharwad, IND· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

22 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

57%

Moderate

Temperature

37°C

Hot

Altitude

733 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Head to head

2Troicki

0Capkovic

2 meetings

Hard 1–0Clay 1–0

Dharwad ChallengerQuarterfinal · 28 Apr 2006HardThis match
Viktor Troicki
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Kamil Capkovic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3
BelgradeQuarterfinal · 2005Clay
Viktor Troicki
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 7⁷
Kamil Capkovic
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Viktor Troicki vs Kamil Capkovic, Dharwad Challenger 2006, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research