Juan Carlos Ferrero vs David Ferrer, Monte Carlo Masters 2006, Round of 16
Final score
Final
Ferrer won in 3 sets · 2h 22m
1–2
Set 11–6
Set 27–65
Set 33–6
Venue and conditions
Monte-Carlo Country ClubMonte-Carlo, MON
ClayCourt speed0.3 vs last year89.0Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
2h 22m1Aces0
1Double faults2
47Service points won61
13Service games played15
6Service games won11
15Return games played13
2/922%Break points saved67%8/12
4/1233%Break points converted78%7/9
Head to head
2Ferrero
7Ferrer
9 meetingsClay 1–3Hard 1–3Carpet 0–1
- Monte Carlo MastersRound of 16 · 20 Apr 2006ClayThis matchDavid FerrerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 65Set 3: 6Juan Carlos FerreroSets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 7Set 3: 3
- Shanghai MastersRound of 16 · 13 Oct 2011HardDavid FerrerSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Juan Carlos FerreroSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 2
- AcapulcoFinal · 27 Feb 2010ClayDavid FerrerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Juan Carlos FerreroSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 1
- Buenos AiresFinal · 21 Feb 2010ClayJuan Carlos FerreroSets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 6David FerrerSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 3
- Australian OpenRound of 16 · 21 Jan 2008HardDavid FerrerSets won: 3Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Set 4: 6Juan Carlos FerreroSets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 4Set 4: 1
- Hamburg MastersRound of 16 · 18 May 2006ClayDavid FerrerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Juan Carlos FerreroSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.