Giorgio Galimberti vs Gianluca Naso, Rome 2006, Round of 16
Final score
Final
7-5 6-7(3) 6-4Venue and conditions
Venue not available
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditions
Forecast not yet available
Head to head
2Galimberti
0Naso
2 meetings- RomeRound of 16 · 2006ClayThis matchGiorgio GalimbertiSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 63Set 3: 6Gianluca NasoSets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 7Set 3: 4
- GenoaRound of 32 · 7 Sept 2005ClayGiorgio GalimbertiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Gianluca NasoSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
Form and path
Giorgio Galimberti3–3
LagosHard
- LRound of 32Hiroki KondoSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Giorgio GalimbertiSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 0
- WQualifying R2Giorgio GalimbertiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Etido UdofaSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0
- WQualifying R1Giorgio GalimbertiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Arinze AdirikaSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0
TriesteClay
- LRound of 16Filippo LeonardiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Giorgio GalimbertiSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 64
- WRound of 32Giorgio GalimbertiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Erik CrepaldiSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 64
Gianluca Naso3–3
LeccoClay
- LRound of 16Liam CaruanaSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Gianluca NasoSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 67Set 3: 3
- WRound of 32Gianluca NasoSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Roberto MarcoraSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R2Gianluca NasoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Ottaviano MartiniSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1
- WQualifying R1Gianluca NasoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Antonio MastreliaSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.