Jasper Smit vs Timo Nieminen, Norrköping 2006, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Hard

Final

Jasper Smit

WinnerRank #706

Smit won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–7³

Set 26–4

Set 36–2

Timo Nieminen

LostRank #1681

Venue

Racketstadion

Norrköping, SWE· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

37 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Head to head

1Smit

0Nieminen

1 meeting

NorrköpingSemifinal · 2006HardThis match
Jasper Smit
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6³Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Timo Nieminen
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 2

Form and path

Jasper Smit5–1

Scheveningen CHClay

Timo Nieminen0–6

Tampere CHClay

LRound of 32
Guillermo Olaso
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Timo Nieminen
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 2

TallinnClay

LRound of 32
Ivan Nedelko
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Timo Nieminen
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 4

BastadClay

LQualifying R1
Matthias Bachinger
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Timo Nieminen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

AlkmaarClay

LRound of 32
Mitchell Krueger
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Timo Nieminen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0

AmstelveenClay

LRound of 32
Ricardo Hocevar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7¹³
Timo Nieminen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6¹¹

BåstadClay

LRound of 32
Jacob Adaktusson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Timo Nieminen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jasper Smit vs Timo Nieminen, Norrköping 2006, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research