Phil Stolt vs Frederik Nielsen, Linköping 2006, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Carpet

Final

Phil Stolt

LostRank #1446

Nielsen won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 17–6³

Set 23–6

Set 34–6

Frederik Nielsen

WinnerRank #1346

Venue

Linköping RacketsportCenter

Linköping, SWE· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

40 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Head to head

0Stolt

2Nielsen

2 meetings

Carpet 0–1Hard 0–1

LinköpingQuarterfinal · 2006CarpetThis match
Frederik Nielsen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6³Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Phil Stolt
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 3Set 3: 4
GothenburgRound of 32 · 2005Hard
Frederik Nielsen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Phil Stolt
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 4

Form and path

Phil Stolt0–6

Granby CHHard

LRound of 32
Ilija Bozoljac
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Phil Stolt
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

BastadClay

LQualifying R1
Johan Brunstrom
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5
Phil Stolt
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
Phil Stolt · Retired

OsloClay

LRound of 32
David-Philipp Stojan
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Phil Stolt
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 4

KrakówClay

LRound of 32
Jan Marek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Phil Stolt
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

ZabrzeClay

LRound of 32
Peter Gojowczyk
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Phil Stolt
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0

MontrealHard

LQuarterfinal
Lester Cook
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6⁶Set 3: 7⁷
Phil Stolt
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6³Set 2: 7⁸Set 3: 6⁵

Frederik Nielsen1–5

DohaHard

LQualifying R1
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Frederik Nielsen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

New YorkHard

LQualifying R1
Go Soeda
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Frederik Nielsen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

Phoenix CHHard

Noumea CHHard

LRound of 64
Daniel Masur
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6
Frederik Nielsen
Sets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 7Set 3: 4

Fairfield CHHard

LQualifying R3
Kevin King
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Frederik Nielsen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Phil Stolt vs Frederik Nielsen, Linköping 2006, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research