Frederik Nielsen vs Martin Emmrich, Malmö 2006, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard

Final

Frederik Nielsen

WinnerRank #1346

Nielsen won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 17–6⁴

Set 26–2

Martin Emmrich

LostRank #1277

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

—

Elevation unavailable

Indoor venue, weather not factored

No reading

Head to head

2Nielsen

0Emmrich

2 meetings

MalmöQuarterfinal · 2006HardThis match
Frederik Nielsen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Martin Emmrich
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 2
LidköpingRound of 16 · 2009Hard
Frederik Nielsen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Martin Emmrich
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Form and path

Frederik Nielsen1–5

DohaHard

LQualifying R1
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Frederik Nielsen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

New YorkHard

LQualifying R1
Go Soeda
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Frederik Nielsen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

Phoenix CHHard

Noumea CHHard

LRound of 64
Daniel Masur
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6
Frederik Nielsen
Sets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 7Set 3: 4

Fairfield CHHard

LQualifying R3
Kevin King
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Frederik Nielsen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3

Martin Emmrich2–4

Maui CHHard

Helsinki CHHard

s HertogenboschGrass

LQualifying R1
Philipp Petzschner
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 6
Martin Emmrich
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 3

Prostejov CHClay

LQualifying R3
Julien Obry
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Martin Emmrich
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Frederik Nielsen vs Martin Emmrich, Malmö 2006, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research