Peter Polansky vs Izak Van Der Merwe, Montreal 2006, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard

Final

Peter Polansky

LostRank #1475

Merwe won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 21–6

Izak Van Der Merwe

WinnerRank #1965

Venue

IGA Stadium

Montreal, CAN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

56 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

0Polansky

2Merwe

2 meetings

MontrealQuarterfinal · 2006HardThis match
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Peter Polansky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
Laguna NiguelSemifinal · 2006Hard
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6
Peter Polansky
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 7Set 3: 3

Form and path

Peter Polansky0–6

Canada MastersHard

LQualifying R1
Max Purcell
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Peter Polansky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

WashingtonHard

LQualifying R1
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Peter Polansky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0

NewportGrass

LQualifying R1
Skander Mansouri
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Peter Polansky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5

CancunHard

LRound of 32
Michail Pervolarakis
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5
Peter Polansky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5
Peter Polansky · Retired

Cleveland CHHard

LQualifying R1
Roberto Quiroz
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Peter Polansky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6⁴

Columbus CHHard

LQualifying R2
Sebastian Fanselow
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Peter Polansky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Izak Van Der Merwe1–5

Leon CHHard

LRound of 32
Louk Sorensen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Rimouski CHHard

LRound of 32
Daniel Cox
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

SherbrookeHard

LRound of 16
Vincent Millot
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
WRound of 32
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Daniel Chu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Guangzhou Nansha CHHard

LRound of 32
Ze Zhang
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Kolkata CHHard

LQualifying R2
Liang Chi Huang
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁵Set 3: 6
Izak Van Der Merwe
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Peter Polansky vs Izak Van Der Merwe, Montreal 2006, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research