Pavel Snobel vs Nicolas Devilder, Ho Chi Minh City Challenger 2006, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 18 Mar

Final

Pavel Snobel

WinnerRank #1502

Snobel won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 17–5

Set 22–6

Set 36–3

Nicolas Devilder

LostRank #1071

Venue

Lan Anh Country Club

Ho Chi Minh City, VIE· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

11 km/h

Light

Humidity

67%

Moderate

Temperature

33°C

Hot

Altitude

9 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Snobel

1Devilder

2 meetings

Ho Chi Minh City ChallengerSemifinal · 18 Mar 2006HardThis match
Pavel Snobel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 2Set 3: 6
Nicolas Devilder
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
Reunion Island ChallengerRound of 32 · 2003Hard
Nicolas Devilder
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Pavel Snobel
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Pavel Snobel vs Nicolas Devilder, Ho Chi Minh City Challenger 2006, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research