Lazaro Navarro vs Alexander Satschko, Cancún 2006, Semifinal
Final score
Final
6-0 4-6 6-3Venue and conditions
Venue not available
Outdoor hardCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditions
Forecast not yet available
Head to head
0Navarro
1Satschko
1 meeting- CancúnSemifinal · 2006HardThis matchAlexander SatschkoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Lazaro NavarroSets won: 1Set 1: 0Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
Form and path
Lazaro Navarro3–3
Córdoba (Mexico)Hard
- LQualifying R2Nicholas Alexander ReyesSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Lazaro NavarroSets won: 0Set 1: 66Set 2: 65
- WQualifying R1Lazaro NavarroSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Oliverio Ortega lorandiSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 2
TehuacánHard
- LRound of 32Mauricio AstorgaSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Lazaro NavarroSets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
PueblaClay
- LRound of 32Dekel BarSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Lazaro NavarroSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R3Lazaro NavarroSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Ivar Jose Aramburu ContrerasSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R2Lazaro NavarroSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Guillermo Duenas MunozSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 3
Alexander Satschko3–3
Guayaquil CHClay
Panama City CHClay
- LQualifying R3Gerald MelzerSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Alexander SatschkoSets won: 0Set 1: 61Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R2Alexander SatschkoSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Guillermo Rivera AranguizSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 4
- WQualifying R1Alexander SatschkoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Luis GomezSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 3
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.