Thomas Oger vs Jakub Hasek, Wrocław 2006, Semifinal
Final score
Final
6-4 7-5Venue and conditions
AZS Środowisko courts and hallWrocław, POL
Indoor hardCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksAltitude119 mLow
Head to head
1Oger
0Hasek
1 meeting- WrocławSemifinal · 2006HardThis matchThomas OgerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Jakub HasekSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
Form and path
Thomas Oger1–5
Monte Carlo MastersClay
Monte Carlo MastersClay
Bagnoles-de-l'OrneClay
- LQualifying R2Maxime ChazalSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Thomas OgerSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
- WQualifying R1Thomas OgerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Manuel GuinardSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
Monte Carlo MastersClay
BressuireHard
- LQuarterfinalMathieu RodriguesSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Thomas OgerSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
Jakub Hasek3–3
LeimenHard
- LRound of 32Patrick SchmolzerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jakub HasekSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
OpoleClay
- LRound of 32Marko MokrzyckiSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 0Jakub HasekSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
Jakub Hasek · Retired
BratislavaClay
- LSemifinalJan KroslakSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 7Jakub HasekSets won: 1Set 1: 62Set 2: 6Set 3: 64
- WQuarterfinalJakub HasekSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Igor ZelenaySets won: 0Set 1: 62Set 2: 2
- WRound of 16Jakub HasekSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Eddy ChalaSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 0
- WRound of 32Jakub HasekSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Tomas TomanSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.