Arvind Parmar vs Christophe Rochus, Rotterdam 2006, Quarterfinal

ATP Intl Gold · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 24 Feb

Final

Arvind Parmar

LostRank #15072.7536%

Rochus won in 2 sets · 1h 9m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 23–6

Christophe Rochus

WinnerRank #9981.5464%

Venue

Rotterdam Ahoy

Rotterdam, NED· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

0.4vs last year

Altitude

4 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Match stats

1h 9m

1Aces4

4Double faults1

29Service points won35

9Service games played9

5Service games won8

9Return games played9

4/850%Break points saved50%1/2

1/250%Break points converted50%4/8

Head to head

0Parmar

1Rochus

1 meeting

RotterdamQuarterfinal · 24 Feb 2006HardThis match
Christophe Rochus
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Arvind Parmar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Arvind Parmar vs Christophe Rochus, Rotterdam 2006, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research