Fabrice Santoro vs Greg Rusedski, Marseille 2006, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-3 6-2
Venue and conditions
Palais des Sports de MarseilleMarseille, FRA
Indoor hardCourt speed2.4 vs last year106.7Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksAltitude15 mSea level
Match stats
1h 13m2Aces4
1Double faults6
40Service points won27
9Service games played8
9Service games won5
8Return games played9
1/1100%Break points saved40%2/5
3/560%Break points converted0%0/1
Head to head
2Santoro
1Rusedski
3 meetingsHard 1–1Clay 1–0
- MarseilleRound of 16 · 16 Feb 2006HardThis matchFabrice SantoroSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Greg RusedskiSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
- MarseilleRound of 16 · 2002HardGreg RusedskiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6Fabrice SantoroSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 4
- Roland GarrosRound of 64 · 2001ClayFabrice SantoroSets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 64Set 3: 6Set 4: 7Greg RusedskiSets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 7Set 3: 3Set 4: 5
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.