Nathan Healey vs Scott Lipsky, Sydney 2006, Quarterfinal

FUTURES · Quarterfinal · Hard

Final

Nathan Healey

WinnerRank #1134

Healey won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–7⁶

Set 26–3

Set 37–6¹

Scott Lipsky

LostRank #912

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Head to head

1Healey

0Lipsky

1 meeting

SydneyQuarterfinal · 2006HardThis match
Nathan Healey
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Scott Lipsky
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 3Set 3: 6¹

Form and path

Nathan Healey2–4

LoomisHard

LRound of 32
Lester Cook
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nathan Healey
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Yuba City CHHard

LQualifying R1
Tim Smyczek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nathan Healey
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

Louisville CHHard

Calabasas CHHard

Scott Lipsky1–5

MemphisHard

LQualifying R1
Tim Smyczek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Scott Lipsky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

WashingtonHard

LQualifying R1
Marinko Matosevic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Scott Lipsky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 0

AucklandHard

LQualifying R1
Benjamin Becker
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Scott Lipsky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

Kuala LumpurHard

BogotaHard

LQualifying R1
Cesar Ramirez
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Scott Lipsky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nathan Healey vs Scott Lipsky, Sydney 2006, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research