Daniel Langre vs Rahim Esmail, Mexico City 2006, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-3 6-3Venue and conditions
Venue not available
Outdoor hardCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditions
Forecast not yet available
Head to head
0Langre
1Esmail
1 meeting- Mexico CityRound of 16 · 2006HardThis matchRahim EsmailSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Daniel LangreSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
Form and path
Daniel Langre2–3
Mexico CityThis week
- WRound of 32Daniel LangreSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Shane La PorteSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
Mexico City CHClay
GuayaquilHard
- LQuarterfinalPablo GonzalezSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Daniel LangreSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
- WRound of 16Daniel LangreSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7Devin MullingsSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 68
- WRound of 32Daniel LangreSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Sergio RamirezSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 65
GuayaquilHard
- LRound of 32Juan Andres GomezSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7Daniel LangreSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
Rahim Esmail0–6
Vancouver CHHard
HarlingenHard
- LRound of 32Nicolas SantosSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Rahim EsmailSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
BrownsvilleHard
- LRound of 32Dave LingmanSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Rahim EsmailSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
São PauloHard
- LRound of 32Dariel LeonSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Rahim EsmailSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0
CriciúmaClay
- LRound of 32Bruno SaviSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Rahim EsmailSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3
QuerétaroHard
- LRound of 32Christoph SteinerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Rahim EsmailSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.