Michael Johnson vs Rolando Vargas, Mexico City 2006, Round of 16
Final score
Final
4-6 6-3 6-4Venue and conditions
Venue not available
Outdoor hardCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditions
Forecast not yet available
Head to head
1Johnson
1Vargas
2 meetingsHard 1–0Clay 0–1
- Mexico CityRound of 16 · 2006HardThis matchMichael JohnsonSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Rolando VargasSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 4
- GuadalajaraRound of 32 · 2007ClayRolando VargasSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michael JohnsonSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Form and path
Michael Johnson1–5
GuadalajaraClay
- LRound of 32Rolando VargasSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michael JohnsonSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Córdoba (Mexico)Hard
- LRound of 32Juan Manuel ElizondoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michael JohnsonSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
Tallahassee CHHard
GatineauHard
- LRound of 32Jason ZimmermannSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michael JohnsonSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
Rolando Vargas2–4
Tallahassee CHHard
CelayaHard
- LRound of 16Roman BorvanovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Rolando VargasSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
- WRound of 32Rolando VargasSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Cristian PaizSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5
GuadalajaraClay
- LRound of 16Roman BorvanovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 68Set 3: 6Rolando VargasSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 7Set 3: 3
- WRound of 32Rolando VargasSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Michael JohnsonSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Córdoba (Mexico)Hard
- LRound of 32Victor RomeroSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 2Set 3: 7Rolando VargasSets won: 1Set 1: 63Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.