Diego Hartfield vs Andre Ghem, Santiago Challenger 2006, Qualifying R3

Challenger · Qualifying R3 · Clay · Mon 23 Jan

Final · Retired

Diego Hartfield

WinnerRank #9491.3568%

Hartfield won · Retired

1–0

Set 16–2

Set 21–0

Andre Ghem

LostRank #13592.9032%

Venue

Club de Tenis Providencia

Providencia, CHI· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

11 km/h

Light

Humidity

58%

Moderate

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

623 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Hartfield

1Ghem

2 meetings

Santiago ChallengerQualifying R3 · 23 Jan 2006ClayThis match
Diego Hartfield
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1
Andre Ghem
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0
Andre Ghem · Retired
CaliRound of 16 · 2005Clay
Andre Ghem
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7⁷
Diego Hartfield
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6⁵

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Diego Hartfield vs Andre Ghem, Santiago Challenger 2006, Qualifying R3

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research