Ralph Grambow vs Jakub Hasek, Kaarst 2006, Semifinal

FUTURES · Semifinal · Carpet

Final

Ralph Grambow

LostRank #1449

Hasek won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 13–6

Set 27–6⁵

Set 33–6

Jakub Hasek

WinnerRank #1204

Venue

Tespo Sportpark Kaarst

Kaarst, GER· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

45 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Head to head

0Grambow

2Hasek

2 meetings

Carpet 0–1Clay 0–1

KaarstSemifinal · 2006CarpetThis match
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁵Set 3: 6
Ralph Grambow
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 3
IngolstadtRound of 16 · 2005Clay
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7⁷
Ralph Grambow
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6³Set 2: 6⁵

Form and path

Ralph Grambow1–5

GausdalHard

LRound of 32
Frank Wintermantel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ralph Grambow
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

GausdalHard

LRound of 32
Alain Ntamag
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁸Set 2: 6
Ralph Grambow
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 4

ExmouthCarpet

LRound of 32
Rasmus Norby
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Ralph Grambow
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁴Set 3: 1

JerseyHard

LRound of 32
Carsten Ball
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Ralph Grambow
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6⁴

BathHard

LQuarterfinal
Gregoire Burquier
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Ralph Grambow
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 3
WRound of 16
Ralph Grambow
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Edward Seator
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Jakub Hasek3–3

LeimenHard

LRound of 32
Patrick Schmolzer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

OpoleClay

LRound of 32
Marko Mokrzycki
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 0
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
Jakub Hasek · Retired

BratislavaClay

LSemifinal
Jan Kroslak
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 7⁷
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6²Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁴
WQuarterfinal
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Igor Zelenay
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6²Set 2: 2
WRound of 16
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Eddy Chala
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 0
WRound of 32
Jakub Hasek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tomas Toman
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ralph Grambow vs Jakub Hasek, Kaarst 2006, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research