Lars Burgsmuller vs Mark Nielsen, Australian Open 2006, Qualifying R1

Grand Slam · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Thu 12 Jan

Final

Lars Burgsmuller

WinnerRank #11291.2077%

Burgsmuller won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–4

Mark Nielsen

LostRank #15194.0023%

Venue

Melbourne Park

Melbourne, AUS· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

2.6vs last year

Wind

23 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

71%

Humid

Temperature

23°C

Warm

Altitude

23 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

6Aces0

4Double faults6

36Service points won30

8Service games played9

8Service games won5

9Return games played8

3/3100%Break points saved20%1/5

4/580%Break points converted0%0/3

Head to head

1Burgsmuller

0Nielsen

1 meeting

Australian OpenQualifying R1 · 12 Jan 2006HardThis match
Lars Burgsmuller
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Mark Nielsen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Lars Burgsmuller vs Mark Nielsen, Australian Open 2006, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research