Troy Hahn vs Jan Stancik, Exmouth 2006, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-4 6-1Venue and conditions
Venue not available
CarpetCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksAltitudeElevation unavailable
Head to head
1Hahn
0Stancik
1 meeting- ExmouthRound of 16 · 2006CarpetThis matchTroy HahnSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jan StancikSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
Form and path
Troy Hahn0–6
DecaturHard
- LRound of 32Tigran MartirosyanSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Troy HahnSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 5
IndianapolisHard
JoplinHard
- LRound of 32Peter ShultsSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Troy HahnSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 66Set 3: 4
PeoriaClay
- LRound of 32Ryler DeheartSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Troy HahnSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
Winnetka CHHard
RochesterClay
- LRound of 32Vahid MirzadehSets won: 2Set 1: 62Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Troy HahnSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 4
Jan Stancik2–4
TrnavaClay
- LRound of 32Filip BrtnickySets won: 0Set 1: 2Jan StancikSets won: 0Set 1: 4
Jan Stancik · Retired
MichalovceClay
- LRound of 16Jan BlechaSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Jan StancikSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 5
- WRound of 32Jan StancikSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Ljubomir CelebicSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
Tatranská LomnicaClay
- LRound of 16Samuel BensoussanSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jan StancikSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
- WRound of 32Jan StancikSets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Pirmin HaenleSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 1Set 3: 5
PorečClay
- LQualifying R2Tomislav DraganjaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Jan StancikSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.