Daniele Bracciali vs Marcos Baghdatis, Bratislava Challenger 2005, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 12 Nov

Final

Daniele Bracciali

WinnerRank #923

Bracciali won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 17–5

Set 24–6

Set 36–4

Marcos Baghdatis

LostRank #179

Venue

National Tennis Centre

Bratislava, SVK· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

143 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

2Bracciali

0Baghdatis

2 meetings

Hard 1–0Carpet 1–0

Bratislava ChallengerSemifinal · 12 Nov 2005HardThis match
Daniele Bracciali
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Marcos Baghdatis
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 4
Ischgl ChallengerRound of 16 · 3 Dec 2003Carpet
Daniele Bracciali
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Marcos Baghdatis
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Daniele Bracciali vs Marcos Baghdatis, Bratislava Challenger 2005, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research