Andrei Stoliarov vs Rok Jarc, Eckental Challenger 2005, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Carpet · Sat 5 Nov

Final · Retired

Andrei Stoliarov

LostRank #1504

Jarc won · Retired

0–1

Set 11–6

Set 21–4

Rok Jarc

WinnerRank #1531

Venue

House of Sports

Eckental, GER· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

88%

Very humid

Temperature

11°C

Cool

Altitude

316 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Stoliarov

2Jarc

2 meetings

Carpet 0–1Hard 0–1

Eckental ChallengerQualifying R1 · 5 Nov 2005CarpetThis match
Rok Jarc
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4
Andrei Stoliarov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1
Andrei Stoliarov · Retired
ZagrebQuarterfinal · 2005Hard
Rok Jarc
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7⁷
Andrei Stoliarov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 6³

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Andrei Stoliarov vs Rok Jarc, Eckental Challenger 2005, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research