Sam Warburg vs Erik Chvojka, Irvine 2005, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard

Final

Sam Warburg

WinnerRank #814

Warburg won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 17–6²

Set 26–3

Erik Chvojka

LostRank #1101

Venue

Racquet Club of Irvine

Irvine, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

21 m

Sea level

Head to head

1Warburg

0Chvojka

1 meeting

IrvineRound of 16 · 2005HardThis match
Sam Warburg
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Erik Chvojka
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6²Set 2: 3

Form and path

Sam Warburg3–3

US OpenHard

LQualifying R1
Michael Berrer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Sam Warburg
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6³

Winnetka CHHard

WRound of 32
Sam Warburg
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ryan Sweeting
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

WimbledonGrass

Yuba City CHHard

Erik Chvojka2–4

Granby CHHard

LRound of 32
Lukas Lacko
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 7
Erik Chvojka
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 5

BastadClay

LQualifying R1
Cristian Garin
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Erik Chvojka
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 1

KarlskronaClay

LRound of 32
Gustav Hansson
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Erik Chvojka
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0

CherkasyHard

LQuarterfinal
Artem Smirnov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Erik Chvojka
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
WRound of 16
Erik Chvojka
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7⁹
Pirmin Haenle
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 6⁷
WRound of 32
Erik Chvojka
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Florian Barth
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Sam Warburg vs Erik Chvojka, Irvine 2005, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research