Jaroslav Levinsky vs Go Soeda, Ho Chi Minh City 2005, Qualifying R2

Final

Jaroslav Levinsky

LostATP: 1196

Soeda won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 10–6

Set 24–6

Go Soeda

WinnerATP: 683

Phu Tho Indoor StadiumHo Chi Minh City, VIE

Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

105.8Fast

Altitude10 mSea level

Head to head

0Levinsky

1Soeda

1 meeting

Ho Chi Minh CityQualifying R2 · 25 Sept 2005CarpetThis match
Go Soeda
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jaroslav Levinsky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 4

Form and path

Jaroslav Levinsky

Ho Chi Minh CityThis week

WQualifying R1
Jaroslav Levinsky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Quang Huy Ngo
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Go Soeda

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jaroslav Levinsky vs Go Soeda, Ho Chi Minh City 2005, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research